Intake notes: injection measured, behavior not yet audited, so it stays unvetted.
Ran scripts/injection-audit.mjs at commit 2de74ac: 88 plugins, 199 agents, 106
commands, and installing the whole catalog costs roughly 25.6k always-on tokens
(tiktoken) just in agent and command descriptions. That’s the real headline. This is
a catalog of catalogs, and broad installation is a heavy context tax; the right use
is to install only the specific plugins you need. A full verdict still needs a
sampling pass (exercise about 3 representative agents: reviewer, architect, one
language specialist) and a check for system-prompt conflicts with house CLAUDE.md
conventions.
wshobson/agents
• Not yet vettedA large catalog of production-focused Claude Code subagents: reviewers, architects, and language specialists, installed per project or globally.
In the intake queue. Listed with facts only; no verdict until a human runs it.
by wshobson subagent Workflows
Last shipped 7 days ago passing liveness · checked Jul 28, 2026
Commit activity · last 52 weeks
Stars38k
LanguagePython
LicenseMIT
Open issues10
Pricingfree
ListedJul 11, 2026
Facts pulled from the source repo and refreshed nightly. Stars are a data point, not our ranking. We don't order by popularity.
Runs in
| Harness | Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | untested | — |
Support levels reflect what we actually ran, not what the README claims. untested means exactly that.
What a vet will check
- The system prompt, and whether it conflicts with your house conventions
- The always-on description cost across the pack
- A sample of representative agents (catalogs are sampled, not run exhaustively)
No verdict is published until a human installs it, runs it, and audits what it injects. How vetting works →